Dub-ya, Dubai and the Democrats
Later in the same issue of The Nation, Eric Alterman bemoans the Democrats' move away from issues such as, "trade unionism, regulation of the market, and various welfare measures." Alterman quotes Michael Kazin who said, "Liberals [have morphed in the public imagination] from people who looked, dressed and sounded like Woody Guthrie to people who look, dress and sound like Woody Allen." This may seem unrelated to the Dubai Ports World issue unless we think about what it means for our own economy that Bush wishes to outsource our infrastructural jobs, no matter to whom. Where are the Deomcrats who would speak for the American workers? Where are the Democrats who, rather than using Bush's own xenophobic rhetoric against him, would change the terms of the debate? Perhaps this is a good time to recall that Dennis Kucinich, when running (and losing) in the Democratic primaries, noted repeatedly that the American infrastructure was crumbling and that a neo-WPA would create jobs and strengthen our nation from within. One election and two hurricanes later, that view is as much a distant footnote in the MSM as Kucinich's campaign once was.
4 Comments:
you think kucinich would be a good president? lets see how he would do with terrorists. hint. we would get nuked. --JC
A good president, I dont mean
Kucinich (there's no chance that would ever happen!) would get our
soldiers out of another religion's holy land plus have excellent
security. GOP is doing neither
very well.
Because terrorists are *always* "nuking" large industrialized nations?
I am not claiming Bush was paid outright-- that's absurd. However, I think that there is possibly a money trail, just as there is a money trail in others of his international dealings. (Just as there was a domstic money trail with the Clintons!) I am also not defending how the Dems have responded to the Dubai proposal. Their response was shamefully xenophobic.
Post a Comment
<< Home