Monday, July 03, 2006

What about Wal-mart, though?

I'm the single mother of a twelve-year-old boy, so I've seen my share of kid movies. Traditional Disney movies, of course, have been politically deconstructed by every liberal with a VCR, but even the "new" animated movies I've taken my son to over the years have caused me, as a liberal mom, to wince. Pixar, Disney's once-subsidiary, promoted misogyny (complete with body parts standing in for female characters) in Toy Story (its sequel, while better politically, failed as a movie); in A Bug's Life, the message seemed to be the intrinsic value of capitalism over less hierarchical political structures; worst of all, in The Incredibles, the traditionally-defined, white nuclear family saved the world from mercenary characters with stereotypically Jewish characteristics. Only Dreamworks's animated comedy Shrek provided welcome relief to Pixar's colorfully hidden conservatism. Now, with Over the Hedge, Dreamworks once again has managed to entertain kids without alienating lefty parents. Over the Hedge comments on sprawl, junk food, greed, and privilege. It critiques a world in which some take more than they need and are willing to sacrifice those with less power in order to keep what they have.

The story's arc is reminiscent of A Bug's Life: A stranger (in this case, RJ the raccoon) joins a band of creatures to exploit their abilities, comes to love them, reveals his duplicity, expresses his feelings, and is forgiven. But this movie also contains several nods to the Greens: For example, upon discovering an SUV, RJ explains that humans need SUVs because "[we] are slowly losing [our] ability to walk." Another creature asks, "It's so big! How many humans does it carry?" And RJ answers, "Usually, one!" When the animals eat tortilla chips modeled after Doritos, RJ lists the chemical ingredients and there's an atomic-scale explosion. The film also nods to those who take issue with Bush's unilateral foreign policy. The greediest suburban property owner, upon learning of the illegality of the vermin extermination system she desires, exclaims, "I don't care if it's against the Geneva Convention! I want it!" And, unlike The Incredibles, which touted the biologically created nuclear family above all else, Over the Hedge suggests that "family" is what you make it.

This smart film isn't politically perfect, of course. The unmarried American female is demonized as a life-hating opportunist, and the only woman of color who acts as a main character in the film (Wanda Sykes) portrays a skunk with lines such as, "I look like a nest and smell like a swamp" and, "I can clear a room... that I can do." Still, compared to the character Legs in Toy Story and the "invisible" Violet in The Incredibles, the women in Over the Hedge give liberals much less about which to complain. Most troublingly, however, this movie also shared its promotional advertising with Wal-mart, the company that contributes most to sprawl and the collapse of our labor and ecosystems. I've struggled to make sense of this seeming hypocrisy, just as I've struggled to make sense of my own: I am liberal, single mother who, nonetheless, has spent hundreds upon hundreds of dollars on politically objectionable kid movies and the merchandise they've inspired.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

While I haven't seen the Pixar films you've decried recently enough to feel comfortable with any sort of full-scale rebuttal, I do know from your post that your boy is an only child, and I can quickly deduce that you either are an only child yourself or didn't have a brother at all close to you in age. Otherwise you'd know that the dismantling of the Barbie is a childhood rite as old as Barbie herself. And the reason is not some deep-seated need for the male to break the female. It is a deep-seated need of most children to *break toys* but preferably those of their siblings. And Barbies are the most breakable of the lot. Alas, my own sister was never interested in Barbies so I was left with nothing to break but my own G.I. Joes. And I did. Their heads, arms, legs, and torsos were strewn willy-nilly through my toy-box. That was not reflective of my sublimated desire to dismantle the military infrastructure. They were just built the same way as Barbie, and hence, quite breakable.

You're also ignoring (or are ignorant of) the fact that the primary writer of "Toy Story" was Joss Whedon, a writer widely lauded for his extraordinarily strong portrayals of female characters in his live-action work. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" for example, was, throughout its 7 years, driven primarily by strong females. His greatest heroes were always women. And frankly, some of his best villains were women as well. His brilliant but short-lived show "Firefly" and the resulting film "Serenity" both have terrific examples of strong, tough, amazing women who at least stand side-by-side equally with men and more frequently are the braver and stronger. And he is currently signed to write and direct a film adaptation of the "Wonder Woman" comic book, based on his oft proven affinity for depicting powerful females in his work.

Though I appreciated your analysis of the political implications of children's films over the past decade, your proposal regarding "Legs" in "Toy Story" just doesn't consider an extremely widely experienced reality that you haven't been through -- kids break toys, and they enjoy it. I don't mean to blame you for not having had the chance to know this reality which the majority of the audience *has* lived, but it is what makes this particular argument of yours highly suspect.

While I can appreciate that your English Teacher training encourages you to look for symbolism, sometimes none is there. Sometimes it's just a joke you didn't get because you don't have the same background as the rest of the audience. And that's nothing against *you* for not getting it. But it's also nothing against the film for you not being able to get it. As Sigmund Freud supposedly said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." Even if that's apocryphal, it holds true as an observation.

If I decide to watch "The Incredibles" again, I'll make another comment, and I might well agree with you. But I *can* say that your casual political portrayal of "Legs" is dismissive of a broader, very common childhood experience, and ignorant of the writer's "track record." And you've made a research mistake there.

I mean, sure, it's just a blog, but still.

11:10 PM  
Blogger Left of Liberal said...

OK, I see your point about Joss Whedon's ouevre. However, just because someone usually writes about strong women does not mean that they *always* do. Toy Story was my son's favorite movie for about two years, so I saw it more than I've ever seen any other movie in my life, and even if you disagree with my analysis of "Legs," please consider that the film's only other female toy of note was the helpless coquette, Bo Peep. Yes, the main character was a boy with boy toys, and yes, kids (even girls, I might add) enjoy dismembering Barbies (my female cousin had a particularly scary box of Barbie body parts when she was a kid), so I'm not fully dismissing the charm of the film's verisimilitude, except... you can't fully justify everything on the basis of verisimilitude in a movie in which THE TOYS COME ALIVE! The movie offers a view of two worlds: the human world (which is quite PC-- a single mom, a tortured little sister who gets her revenge, etc.) and the toy world which features Legs and Bo Peep. The toy world is more interesting to the audience than the human world, and I wonder why care wasn't taken to make it equally egalitarian. As I said in my initial post, care *was* taken in the sequel with the addition of a new, strong female character into the toy world.

I do think that some kids' movies are worth analyzing, particularly movies that our kids watch multiple times. My son and I actually had conversations about the female toys depicted in Toy Story which were good conversations to have, even if you think their starting point was an English teacher's specious overanalysis.

4:14 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home